Thursday, 5 August 2010

Bring all the pleasure of the world to me.


We do is known.

Is analysed.

Everything is obscurely illuminated.

So why not tell them to go fuck off.

H/T again to the lads who have a none handled handle,

“The Mass Psychology of Limited Hangouts on 9/11

The Transparent Conspiracy by Michael D. Morrissey: A Review

The Mass Psychology of Partial Disclosure

The Transparent Conspiracy is a collection of essays written between 2006 and 2010, mainly about the 911 and JFK conspiracies and cover up, with a short collection of poems on the same topic. Morrisey’s latest book is a definite departure from other conspiracy literature. Morrissey has no interest in proving or disproving either the 911 or the JFK conspiracy – he feels this territory is well-covered by other authors. The topic of this book is mass psychology. Morrissey believes our government’s propaganda arm (whatever they call it now) is fully aware that a well-managed conspiracy cover-up can have a very intimidating effect, which can be very effective in keeping the public docile and obedient.

The Government Wants Us to Know

Specifically he argues there is major value (from the government point of view) in disclosing a limited amount of information concerning government culpability in atrocities such as the JFK assassination and 911. He bases his view on something he calls “Transparency Theory” – thus his title The Transparent Conspiracy. He says the CIA has long recognized that “telling part of the truth is the best way to lie.” They even have a term for it: “white propaganda.” Morrissey argues that for the government to brazenly commit criminal acts can be quite effective in demoralizing and alienating the tuned-in segment of the population that fully comprehends the corrupt nature of our government institutions.

He then lays out the hypothetical question: if the reality of the 911 conspiracy were widely accepted by the American public, would they be capable of doing anything about it? Morrissey believes that at this point in history they would be powerless (that they lack the power to bring the culprits to trial or even impeach them). Which he contends is a powerful basis for demoralization and alienation.”

I am still looking for the names and the frames.

What happens when you do not believe a single word of what they have to say?

The one thing I would add is that they are narcissists and need so badly to let us know what they are doing. Derived by admiring themselves, onanistically, in the mirror of our fear and despair can they realise action. Flushed when gliding their long languid stare over their reclining naked form then can they emerge into our world. Imagine if they actually had a secret, they would bust their seminal vesicles keeping it out of circulation. No they must ejaculate what they are up to right into our faces. Bukkake style.

More importantly of course they know that the rules are that we be given a chance to stop them in the certain knowledge that the Herd Attention Space is full of Occult Street Furnishings. Fixed, Rotating and Hidden.


Heads up.

Get ready to gut.